Thursday, November 27, 2008

Gunmen kill at least 82 in rampage across Mumbai

MUMBAI, India – Teams of gunmen stormed luxury hotels, a popular restaurant, hospitals and a crowded train station in coordinated attacks across India's financial capital Wednesday night, killing at least 82 people and taking Westerners hostage, police said. A group of suspected Muslim militants claimed responsibility.

Parts of the city remained under siege as dawn approached Thursday, with police and gunmen exchanging occasional gunfire at two hotels and an unknown number of people still held hostage, said A.N. Roy, a top police official. Soldiers also took up positions across the city.

A raging fire and explosions struck the landmark Taj Mahal hotel shortly after midnight. Screams could be heard and black smoke billowed from the century-old edifice on Mumbai's waterfront. Firefighters sprayed water at the blaze and plucked people from windows and balconies with extension ladders.

The attackers specifically targeted Britons and Americans, witnesses said. Officials said at least 200 people were wounded.

The motive for the onslaught was not immediately clear, but Mumbai has frequently been targeted in terrorist attacks blamed on Islamic extremists, including a series of bombings in July 2006 that killed 187 people.

State home secretary Bipin Shrimali said four suspects had been killed in two incidents when they tried to flee in cars, and Roy said two more gunmen were killed at the Taj Mahal. State Home Minister R.R. Patil said nine more were captured. They declined to provide any further details.

An Indian media report said a previously unknown group calling itself the Deccan Mujahideen had claimed responsibility for the attacks in e-mails to several media outlets. There was no way to verify the claim.

Police reported hostages being held at the Taj Mahal and Oberoi hotels, two of the best-known upscale destinations in this crowded but wealthy city.

Gunmen who burst into the Taj "were targeting foreigners. They kept shouting: `Who has U.S. or U.K. passports?'" said Ashok Patel, a British citizen who fled from the hotel.

Authorities believed seven to 15 foreigners were hostages at the Taj Mahal, but it was not immediately clear if hostages at the Oberoi were Indians or foreigners, said Anees Ahmed, a top state official. It was also unclear where the hostages were in the Taj Mahal, which is divided into an older wing, which was in flames, and a modern tower that was not on fire.

State Department deputy spokesman Robert Wood said U.S. officials were not aware of any American casualties, but were still checking. He said he could not address reports that Westerners might be among the hostages.

"The United States condemns this terrorist attack and we will continue to stand with the people of India in this time of tragedy," White House press secretary Dana Perino said. "President Bush offers his condolences to the Indian people and the families of the innocent civilians killed and injured in the attacks."

Johnny Joseph, chief secretary for Maharashtra state, of which Mumbai is the capital, said 82 people had been killed and 120 had been wounded.

Officials at Bombay Hospital, speaking on condition of anonymity, said a Japanese man had died there and nine Europeans were admitted, three of them in critical condition with gunshot wounds. All were brought in from the Taj Mahal, the officials said.

At least three top Indian police officers — including the chief of the anti-terror squad — were among those killed, said Roy, the senior police official.

Blood smeared the floor of the Chhatrapati Shivaji rail station, where attackers sprayed bullets into the crowded terminal. Press Trust of India quoted the chief of the Mumbai railway police, A.K. Sharma, as saying several men armed with rifles and grenades were holed up at the station.

Other gunmen attacked Leopold's restaurant, a landmark popular with foreigners, and the police headquarters in southern Mumbai, the area where most of the attacks took place. The restaurant was riddled with bullet holes and there were blood on the floor and shoes left by fleeing customers.

Officials also reported that terrorists attacked the city's Cama and Albless Hospital and G.T. Hospital, but it was not immediately clear if anyone was killed in those places.

A British citizen who was dining at the Oberoi hotel told Sky News television that the gunmen who struck there singled out Britons and Americans.

Alex Chamberlain said a gunman, a young man of 22 or 23, ushered 30 or 40 people from the restaurant into a stairway and ordered everyone to put up their hands. He said the gunman spoke in Hindi or Urdu.

"They were talking about British and Americans specifically. There was an Italian guy, who, you know, they said: 'Where are you from?" and he said he's from Italy and they said 'fine' and they left him alone. And I thought: 'Fine, they're going to shoot me if they ask me anything — and thank God they didn't," he said.

Chamberlain said he managed to slip away as the patrons were forced to walk up stairs, but he thought much of the group was being held hostage.

Early Thursday, several European lawmakers were among people who barricaded themselves inside the Taj, a century-old seaside hotel complex and one of the city's best-known destinations.

"I was in the main lobby and there was all of a sudden a lot of firing outside," said Sajjad Karim, part of a delegation of European lawmakers visiting Mumbai ahead of a European Union-India summit.

As he turned to get away, "all of a sudden another gunmen appeared in front of us, carrying machine gun-type weapons. And he just started firing at us ... I just turned and ran in the opposite direction," he told The Associated Press over his mobile phone.

Hours later, Karim remained holed up in a hotel restaurant, unsure if it was safe to come out.

The British Foreign Office said it was advising all British citizens in Mumbai to stay indoors.

Britain's foreign secretary, David Miliband, strongly condemned the attacks. "Today's attacks in Mumbai which have claimed many innocent victims remind us, yet again, of the threat we face from violent extremists," Miliband said in a statement.

India has been wracked by bomb attacks the past three years, which police blame on Muslim militants intent on destabilizing this largely Hindu country. Nearly 700 people have died.

Since May a militant group calling itself the Indian Mujahideen has taken credit for a string of blasts that killed more than 130 people. The most recent was in September, when a series of explosions struck a park and crowded shopping areas in the capital, New Delhi, killing 21 people and wounding about 100.

Mumbai has been hit repeatedly by terror attacks since March 1993, when Muslim underworld figures tied to Pakistani militants allegedly carried out a series of bombings on Mumbai's stock exchange, trains, hotels and gas stations. Authorities say those attacks, which killed 257 people and wounded more than 1,100, were carried out to avenge the deaths of hundreds of Muslims in religious riots that had swept India.

Ten years later, in 2003, 52 people were killed in Mumbai bombings blamed on Muslim militants and in 2006 a series of seven blasts on railway trains and at commuter rail stations killed at least 187.

Relations between Hindus, who make up more than 80 percent of India's 1 billion population, and Muslims, who make up about 14 percent, have sporadically erupted into bouts of sectarian violence since British-ruled India was split into independent India and Pakistan in 1947.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

What is fatwa?

Muslims believe that since the beginning of mankind by Adam and Eve, and the story of getting out of Paradise; God promised us Mankind to get back to the paradise - where we belong - when we pass an exam which is life. So as time goes by mankind started to forget, why are we in earth and what are we supposed to do, how should we behave, what's the decision to take in that issue and that one .etc

So, God started sending prophets as Guides to the right path in life, some of them with Holy Books to a certain group of people in a certain geographical areas, these Holy Books' function was to remind people; why are they here, how are they supposed to act and how are they going to be judged by God.

In different places on earth, and in different periods of time, what you should and shouldn't do, or in other words what's prohibited and what's not, was logically different but still all prophets were sent with the same "Core Belief" of a one God, and promoting the same principles of kindness, love and worshiping God. And in my belief every human being is born with these principles planted deeply in his own soul, including yourself!

And Muslims believe that God had sent the final prophet; Mohamed (peace and blessings be up on him) to the whole world as God knew that his message will reach every living human being on earth.

So, Prophet Mohamed wasn't sent to a limited group of people in a limited geographical area or in a bounded age, his message was meant to reach everyone. The main tools in order for prophet Mohamed to clarify to mankind his message was mainly the final words of God; the Holy Quran, then what he agreed on and told people to do and don't do, as he was taught by God and was getting the message across as a living example. what prophet Mohamed directed us to is named "Sunnah".

So the Holy Quran, is the core of a Muslim's belief, and Sunnah or what prophet Mohamed taught us; is the illustration and practical example of the Holy Quran.

But of course as time goes by, and as the circumstances differ from place to place, from time to time, and from person to person. Islamic sciences had been started by extracting the rules from the Quran and Sunnah, and then comes different concepts that would be complex to get into now but I can sum it up by saying it implies using Human's creativity and understanding of Quran and Sunnah, to judge something if it goes well with the core belief and core behavior or it doesn't.

A certain people who's mostly religious in belief and behavior, balanced and intelligient was able to go through that science and "Measure" if a certain issue is acceptable or prohibited "Halal" or "Haram".

Those people, who used to be scientists not only in religious sciences but in a lot of cases developed also brilliant work in astronomy, physics, philosophy, social sciences and algebra, was being asked from people who don't know or not sure if they're supposed to do that or not for a Fatwa!

As societies grown in population and geographical area, a well-known scholars "researchers" with a good knowledge of Islamic Science should provide the Muslim community with Fatwas! clarifying the things that frequently face them on their daily lives, things like smoking is it okay or not, Yoga for example what should I take from it and what I shouldn't?

Also, those highly qualified researchers in Islamic Sciences should be available if someone want to ask a certain question that he faced, and in a lot of cases a Fatwa in the same subject that could be declared to person "A" might be totally different for another person "B", why? because they might have a different circumstances, living in a different environment or have different concerns, so a Mufti should be intelligient and take the context during which the Fatwa had been asked into perspective.

So, Fatwa! always involved a level of creativity and intelligence and ability to measure, and further more; measuring the reason WHY that person is asking that question, does he want to do a bad thing and get away with it, so that the intelligient Mofty - who should be highly qualified in communication skills - should tell them No, It's prohibited for you now, here at that context. Or he's a kind person had forced in a certain situation and he's so pure from inside and need TOLERANCE to ease his life so the Mofty should be tolerant and let him ease his life. Prophet Mohamed was always choosing the easier for people.

Furthermore, Prophet Mohamed hadn't let the issue be random, when he had been asked from a companion what if I had been gives different Fatwas! he told something that's logical to whom read the Quran and understood the Sunnah, he told consult your heart even if they give Fatwa to you ask Fatwa from your heart what do you think? you know why you want to do that more than anyone else, do you think that it's against your belief? does it affect your behavior and get you being disrespectful or whatever negative behavior you might do.

So, a Fatwa! what made - and will make - Islam as a religion applicable in any community at any time, with tolerance, flexibility and understanding. The core beliefs never change, but how people interpret different issues it's up to them.

Fatwa! isn't obligatory, It's the outcome of a research conducted by a scholar and involved a level of human creativity that might differ from someone to another, so what to do then if we got two different Fatwas from highly qualified scholars, we return to what Prophet Mohamed teach us, and measure it by our hearts and see if it goes with our souls! Why because that's the core of our being. Islam isn't meant to concentrate on trivial matters, those issues could be judged with someone who's just pure from inside and doing his best to be a good Muslim! a good Human Being after all!

Source: Academy.Com

Monday, November 24, 2008

A Somali's perception of Mahathir

I'm a Somali living in Malaysia who follows the local scene here very much. I would have to admit that Tun Dr M's greatest disadvantage is his pure, unadulterated hatred for anyone who disagrees with him. Never have I seen a human being whose sole motivation, drive and engine is pure hatred. Just visit his blog which is read by friends and foes, locals and foreigners and I must tell you it epitomizes him in every way.

Since he started it after complaining of UMNO media strangulation, did you see an article that he has written concerning the poor, the needy, the widows, the orphans, the handicapped, the downtrodden, the wayfarers, compassion, empathy, sharing, sacrifice, charity, morality, accountability, God's fear and Judgement, forgiveness, patience (etc)? No.

Always it is about some people, blaming others, calling them names, dishing out unvanished, pure hatred. Blaming others for this and that and exonerating himself from all blame? Surely, at this age? You can't build a society and a nation through hate, vengeance, intense anger and mean spirit. You would have to remind the people the higher purpose of life for them to get motivated and work harder for the less fortunate and for themselves. Finger pointing, blaming others, planting defeatist culture in the Malays, reducing them to mad people (we are sensitive, we will run amok society that makes even foreigners despise the Malays) will not help this society and nation.

My people (the Somalis) suffered from cruel leadership and when the hatred became too much, we turned to each other and till today, we the only nation with no Central govt. The Malays share with us almost every trait, very feudal, manipulated easily, territorial, misuse of Islam for expediency, rigid explanation of Islam and too much interest in outward Islam than inward Islam that strengthens the hearts, our only difference is that the Malays have the Chinese and the Indians around that make them watch out for the "enemies."

For us, we didn't have that and that's why we turned to each other. If God has loved the Malays and Malaysia, it is because He brought other people here. If some Malays regret the presence of the Chinese and Indians, ask us the Somalis and you will know what it means to be an incestous (homogenous) society and you will praise the Almighty day in day out. If it was possible, I would have shipped the Chinese and Indians to Somalia to create diversity in my nation but it is wishful thinking.

The other person who makes me cringe in shame is one Curry[Khairy] Jamaluddin. Never have I seen a more uncouth, uncultured, degenerate, pugancious, ill, nefarious and utterly infantile being than this young man. I have a big heart who tries to understand everyone and put myself in their place, but I don't think my heart can accommodate one Curry Jamaluddin. He is a primate and deserves the worst treatment (though I hate it because we are Muslims and human beings) but honestly he is too much.

Abubakar
October 25, 2008 at 5:43 pm

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Ethnic Indians' get 7% quota in Malaysia

In a major sop to minority ethnic Indians demanding more rights, Malaysian government has doubled the quota for the community in the country's civil service from 3.5 per cent to seven per cent.

The decision was taken by Premier Abdullah Badawi on Friday, Human Resources Minister D S Subramaniam said. The announcement came against the backdrop of demands for equal treatment by ethnic Indians, spearheaded by the non-governmental Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) which has been banned by the government.

Subramaniam said that Abdullah had also given an assurance that applications for the civil service would be approved based on job descriptions and merit.

Earlier in a statement, he urged the Public Services Commission (PSC) to ensure a minimum intake of at least seven per cent of ethnic Indians in all job categories in the public service.

Currently the country's civil services are dominated by Malays, who form the majority of Malaysia's 27 million population.

Meanwhile, ethnic Indian elected representatives of the opposition Pakatan Rakyat alliance held talks with India-based NGOs and local councillors yesterday to ascertain if the minority community's circumstances had improved after the

March 8 general election in Malaysia and the November 25 rally by the Hindraf complaining of racial inequality. Ethnic Indians, a majority of them Tamils, form eight percent of Malaysia's population.

Among topics discussed were the intake of Indians into the civil service and promotions possibilities, Tamil school issues, single mothers, stateless Indians and business opportunities for Indians. While it was felt the community had seen changes, the group sought larger and more transparent changes.